Trending Topics

From 73 to 33 minutes: How Sacramento reinvented patient offload times

What happens when EMS, hospitals and fire come together with one mission? A cultural shift that put the patients first while lifting morale and saving time

Wall times

Photo/ChatGPT

A conference session report from the 2025 EMS Administrators Association of California (EMSAAC) Conference with speakers Gregory Kahn, MD, EMS director, Sacramento County EMS; Jon Rudniki, assistant chief, Sacramento Metro Fire; and Kim Adams, ED director, Kaiser Roseville (Calif.) Medical Center offered proved strategies to reduce ambulance patient offload times.

[Fill out the form on this page to download an Ambulance Patient Offload Time (APOT) Redesign Checklist based on Sacramento’s success story and built around the shared goal of “caring for the next patient” for every stakeholder group.]

|More: Ambulances held hostage: EMS strategies for reducing ambulance offload times

Bottom line up front

From December 2023 to April 2025, Sacramento County slashed average ambulance patient offload times (APOT) from 73 to 33 minutes. Kaiser Roseville, one of California’sbusiest EDs, dropped below 30 minutes and became a model for the region. The changes didn’t require a state mandate, expensive tech or finger-pointing.

This transformation required leaders willing to show up, collaborate and hand over the mic to the people doing the work.
Ambulance patient offload time — or APOT — isn’t just a metric. It’s a measure of our system’s ability to respond, reset and reach the next patient in need.

And in Sacramento County, APOT was once so dire, it earned a spot at the bottom of the state’s performance rankings. But through leadership, collaboration and laser focus on what truly matters — the patient — this region went from worst to among the best in under a year.

This is the story of how Sacramento broke the cycle. It’s a blueprint others can follow, and it starts not with a dashboard, but with a room full of people.

Patient offload times: Starting at rock bottom

When Dr. Gregory Kahn took over as EMS medical director for Sacramento County in late 2023, he inherited an APOT crisis: average offload times had reached 73 minutes and weren’t improving. EMS crews were stuck on the wall. Emergency departments were overwhelmed. Morale was low.

“There was no light at the end of the tunnel,” Kahn told a packed room at this year’s EMSAAC conference. “We had call volume records, transport records and zero slack in the system.”

But instead of blaming the problem on hospitals or fire departments, Kahn picked up the phone and started building a coalition.

Summit strategy: Getting the family in the room

On Feb. 13, 2024, leaders from EMS, fire, hospitals, county government, union reps, private ambulance partners and behavioral health met for a full-day APOT summit, which was standing-room only.

“We treated it like a family meeting,” Sacramento Metro Fire Assistant Chief Jon Rudniki recalled. “Yes, there was pain. But we hugged it out and got on the same page.”

And the unifying theme? The next patient.

“That’s what ties us together,” Rudnicki added. “We may have different uniforms and roles, but we all care about the next call — the person who hasn’t dialed 911 yet, but will.”

Strategies to unilaterally reduce ED wait times and get back into service

Empowering the front line

While high-level discussions were taking place, frontline change was already brewing. Kaiser Roseville ED Director Kim Adams left the summit inspired, and with her EMS liaison, launched an internal APOT task force. With no new budget, they redesigned their intake process using their own nurses to create “Ami Road” — a designated care lane that absorbed patients quickly and started their treatment right away.

From over 70 minutes in February, Kaiser Roseville’s offload time dropped to 24 minutes by November — and stayed there, even during high census months.

The secret? Staff ownership, storytelling, and a clear message: “We do this for the next patient.”

Fire’s fixes and field empowerment

Meanwhile, Sacramento’s 911 fire agencies implemented major operational changes:

  • Dispatch drawdowns to avoid tying up resources on low-acuity calls
  • 50/50 protocols giving paramedics decision-making power to move stable patients directly to waiting rooms — without waiting for nurse permission
  • Surge plans activating private partners to cover when EMS system capacity dropped
  • BLS units and telehealth pilots to absorb and redirect volume appropriately

“It wasn’t just about asking hospitals to do better,” Rudnicki said. “We had to step up, too — and we did.”

Insert internal promo: Ambulances held hostage: EMS strategies for reducing ambulance offload times

The culture shift that stuck

Improving metrics is one thing. Sustaining momentum is another.

“We made storytelling a part of the culture,” Adams said. “Whether it’s a cardiac arrest save or a new grad nurse moving a patient in under 5 minutes, we celebrate the wins and tie them back to our mission.”

The team even shared a powerful case study: a Folsom man collapsed after a run, was reached quickly by EMS (because crews weren’t stuck at hospitals), and survived a cardiac arrest neurologically intact.

That, they say, is why this matters.

A global roadmap to reducing APOT

As I noted in the session Q&A, I’ve run an ambulance service in the U.K. and faced the same APOT battle. What Sacramento has done isn’t just a California success — it’s a global roadmap to reducing patient offload times. They’ve proven what happens when you stop arguing about who’s at fault and start focusing on who’s at risk: the patient still waiting for help.

To borrow this year’s EMSAAC theme, Sacramento is truly “United in mission.”

Fill out the form on this page to download the Ambulance Patient Offload Time (APOT) Redesign Checklist based on Sacramento’s success story and built around the shared goal of “caring for the next patient” for every stakeholder group, including:

  • EMS agency/fire departments
  • Hospital emergency departments
  • EMS agencies (regulatory/local EMS agencies [LEMSA])
  • Private ambulance providers
  • Hospital executive/administrative leadership
  • Culture & communication strategies (all stakeholders)

References

  1. Kerr JF. (2022, March 23). “The great resignation didn’t start with the pandemic.” Human Resource Management.
  2. Kouzes JM, Posner BP. (2017). “The Leadership Challenge”. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  3. Robeano K. (2017). “Stay interviews to improve retention.” Nursing Management, 48(9), 7-8.
Rob Lawrence has been a leader in civilian and military EMS for over a quarter of a century. He is currently the director of strategic implementation for PRO EMS and its educational arm, Prodigy EMS, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and part-time executive director of the California Ambulance Association.

He previously served as the chief operating officer of the Richmond Ambulance Authority (Virginia), which won both state and national EMS Agency of the Year awards during his 10-year tenure. Additionally, he served as COO for Paramedics Plus in Alameda County, California.

Prior to emigrating to the U.S. in 2008, Rob served as the COO for the East of England Ambulance Service in Suffolk County, England, and as the executive director of operations and service development for the East Anglian Ambulance NHS Trust. Rob is a former Army officer and graduate of the UK’s Royal Military Academy Sandhurst and served worldwide in a 20-year military career encompassing many prehospital and evacuation leadership roles.

Rob is the President of the Academy of International Mobile Healthcare Integration (AIMHI) and former Board Member of the American Ambulance Association. He writes and podcasts for and is a member of the Editorial Advisory Board. Connect with him on .